None of that shit was what made Dead Space 1 or 2 such great games. The third one was during the phase where EA demanded a multiplayer mode be prominent in all their games, required dlc, and cancelled anything that wasn't a "megahit" out of the gate. EA wanted Call of Duty like successes from all their games. The studio (Visceral) wanted to make resident evil in space. DS1 was developed on a budget game investment amount and it sold 2 million copies, DS2 had 60 million invested in it and sold 4 million copies, which despite doubling the sales of the first game, was not high enough to meet EA's projections. The first two were runaway hits that had low expectations of sales numbers from EA. The reason 3 was like that was because DS was a victim of its own success. The graphics were good and the co-op was fun, but it doesn't feel like the first two games, there's a definite shift towards being "the hero" rather than "a survivor." I could see it being remade, but the story would need a rewrite and the plentiful co-op resources would need to be toned way down. The story was adapted to accommodate that. Isaac is more than a match for any enemy type.
Even in the hardest difficulties there is enough ammo for 2 players to never worry about it. It was a co-op action game that felt more like Lost Planet or Halo.
Ammo is scarce, the story is terrifying, the ambience and atmosphere are amazing.ģ was the game that killed the series.
So DS1 and 2 are true survival horror games on hard and hardest.
0 kommentar(er)
